Journal of Semantics Advance Access published online on May 3, 2005
Journal of Semantics, doi:10.1093/jos/ffh025
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Northwestern University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. This paper proposes a compositional model-theoretic account of the way the interpretation of indicative conditionals is determined and constrained by the temporal and modal expressions in their constituents. The main claim is that the tenses in both the antecedent and the consequent of an indicative conditional are interpreted in the same way as in isolation. This is controversial for the antecedents of predictive conditionals like If he arrives tomorrow, she will leave, whose Present tense is often claimed to differ semantically from that in their stand-alone counterparts, such as He arrives tomorrow. Under the unified analysis developed in this paper, the differences observed in pairs like these are explained by interactions between the temporal and modal dimensions of interpretation. This perspective also sheds new light on the relationship between non-predictive and epistemic readings of indicative conditionals.
Received August 12, 2004
Special Issue Article
Conditional Truth and Future Reference
Stefan Kaufmann, E-mail: kaufmann{at}northwestern.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Gunji, S. Kaufmann, and Y. Takubo Modality and Evidentiality J Semantics, August 1, 2008; 25(3): 221 - 227. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Asher and E. McCready Were, Would, Might and a Compositional Account of Counterfactuals J Semantics, May 1, 2007; 24(2): 93 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
