Skip Navigation


Journal of Semantics Advance Access originally published online on February 6, 2009
Journal of Semantics 2009 26(2):109-158; doi:10.1093/jos/ffn013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/2/109    most recent
ffn013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lascarides, A.
Right arrow Articles by Asher, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Agreement, Disputes and Commitments in Dialogue

Alex Lascarides

University of Edinburgh

Nicholas Asher

Université Paul Sabatier

Correspondence: ALEX LASCARIDES, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10, Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, Scotland, United Kingdom, e-mail: alex{at}inf.ed.ac.uk

Correspondence: NICHOLAS ASHER IRIT, Université Paul Sabatier, 118, Route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse, France, e-mail: asher{at}irit.fr


  Abstract

This paper provides a logically precise analysis of agreement and disputes in dialogue. The semantics distinguishes among the public commitments of each dialogue agent, including commitments to relational speech acts or rhetorical relations (e.g. Narration, Explanation and Correction). Agreement is defined to be the shared entailments of the agents' public commitments. We show that this makes precise predictions about implicit agreement. The theory also provides a consistent interpretation of disputes and models what content is agreed upon when a dispute has taken place.

Received for publication 8 January 2008. Revision received 10 October 2008. Accepted for publication 17 November 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.