Skip Navigation


Journal of Semantics Advance Access originally published online on November 16, 2006
Journal of Semantics 2006 23(4):315-360; doi:10.1093/jos/ffl006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/4/315    most recent
ffl006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ionin, T.
Right arrow Articles by Matushansky, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Composition of Complex Cardinals

Tania Ionin

USC/UIUC

Ora Matushansky

CNRS/Université Paris 8

Correspondence: TANIA IONIN, University of Southern California, Department of Linguistics, GFS 301, 3601 Watt Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089. e-mail: ionin{at}usc.edu

Correspondence: ORA MATUSHANSKY, Université Paris VIII, UMR 7023 (D-327), 2 rue de la Liberté, 93526 Saint Denis CEDEX, France. e-mail: matushan{at}univ-paris8.fr


  Abstract

This paper proposes an analysis of the syntax and semantics of complex cardinal numerals, which involve multiplication (two hundred) and/or addition (twenty-three). It is proposed that simplex cardinals have the semantic type of modifiers (<<e, t>, <e, t>>). Complex cardinals are composed linguistically, using standard syntax (complementation, coordination) and standard principles of semantic composition. This analysis is supported by syntactic evidence (such as Case assignment) and semantic evidence (such as internal composition of complex cardinals). We present several alternative syntactic analyses of cardinals, and suggest that different languages may use different means to construct complex cardinals even though their lexical semantics remains the same. Further issues in the syntax of numerals (modified numerals and counting) are discussed and shown to be compatible with the proposed analysis of complex cardinals. Extra-linguistic constraints on the composition of complex cardinals are discussed and compared to similar restrictions in other domains.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.