Skip Navigation

Journal of Semantics 1992 9(4):333-377; doi:10.1093/jos/9.4.333
© 1992 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER SANDT, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution

ROB A. VAN DER SANDT

University of Nijmegen

The present paper presents an anaphoric account of presupposition. It is argued that presuppositional expressions should not be seen as referring expressions, nor is presupposition to be explicated in terms of some non-standard logic. The notion of presupposition should not be relegated to a pragmatic theory either. Instead presuppositional expressions are claimed to be anaphoric expressions which have internal structure and semantic content. In fact they only differ from pronouns and other semantically less loaded anaphors in that they have more descriptive content. It is this fact which enables them to create an antecedent in case discourse does not provide one. If their capacity to accommodate is taken into account they can be treated by basically the same mechanism which handles the resolution of pronouns. The theory is elaborated in the framework of discourse representation theory. It is shown that pragmatic factors interfere in the resolution of presuppositional anaphors. The resulting account can neither be classified as wholly semantic nor wholly pragmatic. Section 1 presents a survey of standing problems in the theory of presupposition projection and discusses the major competing approaches. An argumentation for a purely anaphoric account of presupposition is given in section 2. Section 3 presents a coding of presuppositional expressions in an extension of discourse representation theory. The final section is devoted to a discussion of the constraints which govern the resolution of presuppositional anaphors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J SemanticsHome page
D. Abusch
Presupposition Triggering from Alternatives
J Semantics, August 26, 2009; (2009) ffp009v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J SemanticsHome page
E. Maier
Proper Names and Indexicals Trigger Rigid Presuppositions
J Semantics, August 1, 2009; 26(3): 253 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J SemanticsHome page
Y. Greenberg
Presupposition Accommodation and Informativity Considerations with Aspectual Still
J Semantics, February 1, 2009; 26(1): 49 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J SemanticsHome page
R. Breheny
A New Look at the Semantics and Pragmatics of Numerically Quantified Noun Phrases
J Semantics, May 1, 2008; 25(2): 93 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J SemanticsHome page
F. Schwarz
Processing Presupposed Content
J Semantics, December 1, 2007; 24(4): 373 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.