© 2002 by Oxford University Press
The Average American has 2.3 Children
1 Department of Linguistics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY USA 14627. e-mail: Carlson{at}ling.rochester.edu 2 Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E5. e-mail: jeffp{at}cs.ualberta.ca
Average-NPs, such as the one in the title of this paper, have been claimed to be linguistically identical to any other definite-NPs but at the same time to be semantically inconsistent with these other definite-NPs. To some this is an ironclad proof of the irrelevance of semantics to linguistics. We argue that both of the initial claims are wrong: average-NPs are not linguistically identical to other definite-NPs but instead show a number of interesting divergences, and we provide a plausible semantic account for them that is not semantically inconsistent with the account afforded other definite-NPs but in fact blends quite nicely with one standard account of the semantics for NPs.
Received 19.10.2001. Revised 10.04.2002.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Kennedy and J. Stanley On 'Average' Mind, September 26, 2009; (2009) fzp094v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
